Thoughts on structure:Branding Subcommittee -- a group that would handle getting us to a consistent "look". It needs to involve the major usersWebsite Subcommittee -- Website committee should be a subcommittee. We need more involvement. There are two parts to this -- handling humans and programming -- we need to be recruiting people with appropriate skill sets -- human (Paul is handling, doing a great job, wants help), advanced programmer (php and javascript), various content providers and reviewers.Social Media -- working great right now! Internal Communications Subcommittee -- work to figure out what we need to do to improve -- as a Society, this seems to be one of our biggest challenges -- needs to involve our contractors and all the committee chairs and needs to work with the Chapter Council-- should not be a committee just to create structures that we don't implementPublications -- It died with Bob E. We need to determine if we can retrieve any of his work (Cammie?) -- It also was not working -- this idea is still useful -- it may be coordination with those responsible for implementing the key strategic plan initiatives -- I think we have someone who might enjoy handling this -- and he is future leadership material. At least when last visited by FNPS leadership, the concept was providing a vetted library of pre-done materials that could be provided to local media for publication.Publicity (External Communications Subcommittee?)-- not clear -- and what it is it might need to come out of strategic plan initiatives -- we need someone interested in this to lead ithe subcommittee -- and there is overlap with Publications as last confiburedOther ideas ??
